Profile:
angelagarnett

This is your Profile page. Use it to check replies to your comments, keep track of comments you've made or endorsed, and manage your regulation room account.

Watch a Video: Understanding Your Profile Page [0:38]

What's Happening Now

June 3, 2010 4:44 pm

My 9 year old daughter is one of the “peanut people” you mentioned in your post. While no one has seemed to have died due to peanuts on Southwest, the threat is there. I feel confident if you had a loved one with this life threatening allergy, you would feel differently.
My daughter has been tested 4 times for her allergy to peanuts. She is in the highest category of reactivity which means if peanuts are being ingested in her vicnity, she could die. A buffer zone simply doesn’t work in a cinfined space such as an airline. I have to treat her with Benadryl before any flights as a precaution. There are many more food and snack options that don’t have the anaphylaxis potential to innocent human beings. I for one am ecstatic to hear about this initiative. It’s becoming news for a good reason. People- kids- are dying from this and it can be 100% prevented.

June 3, 2010 4:46 pm

I agree. While my daughter is peanut allergic only, I would in no way be opposed to banning other foods that are common anaphylaxis causers on a plane.

June 3, 2010 4:53 pm

Only problem is the recycled air. Buffer zones aren’t quite enough for those in the highest reactivity grouping.

June 3, 2010 4:55 pm

Just as smoking was removed from flights due to the health risks to innocent travelers, this falls into the same category. The main difference is that a peanut reaction happens rather quickly and lung cancer/emphysema can take years. Hmmm….

June 3, 2010 4:56 pm

When people start dying from the aroma of perfume and deodorant or cotton clothing, your comments will be taken seriously. Keep this in perspective.